USPTO serial 75671177
ATREUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATREUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANA L HARTJE
DANA L HARTJE SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS TO CREATE AND MANAGE THE DELIVERY OF AUDIO, VIDEO, AND DATA CONTENT VIA COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, USING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO PROVIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS, APPLICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS AND COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS RELATING TO THE DELIVERY AND MARKETING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS, APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS AND COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS; INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, USING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO PROVIDE COMPUTER INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS, APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS AND COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS RELATING TO THE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND SYSTEM INTEGRATION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERS TO MONITOR USAGE PATTERNS AMONG CUSTOMERS AND SUBSCRIBERS, TO IDENTIFY GROUPS OF CUSTOMERS OR SUBSCRIBERS WITH COMMON USAGE PATTERNS, INTERESTS, NEEDS OR REQUIREMENTS, AND TO CREATE AND MANAGE THE DELIVERY OF AUDIO,VIDEO AND DATA CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |