USPTO serial 75671270
BILLIARDS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BILLIARDS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory W. Carr
GREGORY W CARR CARR & STORM, LLP670 FOUNDERS SQ900 JACKSON STDALLAS, TX 75202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING LINKS TO WEBSITES, CREATING AND PUBLISHING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS, AND PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS IN AN ELECTRONIC MAGAZINE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 1997 |
| 038 | COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING ON-LINE BULLETIN BOARDS IN THE FIELD OF BUYING AND SELLING OF BILLIARDS AND POOL EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 1997 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION AND NEWS AND ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING BILLIARDS, POOL, FOOSBALL, AND DART LEAGUES AND TOURNAMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |