USPTO serial 75671660
ORTHOFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORTHOFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | PODIATRIC PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF FOOT ORTHOSES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF FOOT DISORDERS AND IN THE REALIGNMENT OF A PERSON'S SKELETAL STRUCTURE TO AMELIORATE OR PREVENT PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN THAT SKELETAL STRUCTURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CUSTOM-FITTING AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD ORTHOSES, FEATURING THE SCANNING OF FEET TO OBTAIN SHAPE DATA, TRANSMITTING THE SHAPE DATA TO A COMPUTER FOR COMPARISON WITH A DATABASE CONTAINING INFORMATION ON FOOT ORTHOSES, SELECTING A FOOT ORTHOSIS BASED UPON THE COMPARISON, AND FITTING THE SELECTED FOOT ORTHOSIS TO THE PATIENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |