Drawing for GOLF YARDS

USPTO serial 75671762

GOLF YARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLF YARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH T. NABOR

JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERYSTE 1600 120 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING NAMELY, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, GOLF SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, COATS, GOLF SHOES, HAT, CAPS, JACKETS, SLACKS, SOCKS, SPORT COATS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SUN VISORS, RAINCOATS, BELTS, WAISTCOAT, BLOUSES, PULLOVERS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SUITS, CHEMISES, UNDERWEAR, GLOVES, TIES, SCARFS, BOOTS, SHOES, SLIPPERS, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BEACH AND BATHING COVER-UPS, SWEAT SHORTS, GYM SHORTS, TOPS, KNIT SHIRTS, VESTS, TANK TOPS, CASUAL FOOTWEAR, SANDALS, VISORS, HEADBANDS; SWEATBANDS; WRIST BANDS, NECKWEAR, NECKTIES, NECKERCHIEFS, BANDANNAS, SLEEPWEAR, ROBES, PAJAMAS, NIGHT SHIRTS, BOXER SHORTS, UNDERGARMENTS, ANKLET SOCKS, ANORAKS AND PARKAS, APRONS, ASCOTS, ATHLETIC SHOES, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS, BABY BUNTING, BERMUDA SHORTS, BLAZERS, CARDIGANS, LEATHER COATS, GYM SUITS, HALTER TOPS, INFANT WEAR, JOGGING SUITS, KNICKERS, UNDERSHIRTS, THERMAL SOCKS, SUSPENDERS, TURTLENECK SWEATERS AND V-NECK SWEATERSACTIVE—
035PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH AN INCENTIVE REWARDS PROGRAM WHEREBY CUSTOMERS ACQUIRE AWARDS THROUGH THE PURCHASES OF GOLF RELATED GOODS AND SERVICES AND HOTEL ACCOMMODATION AND SERVICES INCIDENTAL THERETOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 2, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 18, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance