Drawing for UROS

USPTO serial 75671840

UROS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UROS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine W. White

KATHERINE W WHITE KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, INTRAVESICAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS COMPRISING A DRUG RESERVOIR FOR IMPLANTATION WITHIN THE BLADDERACTIVENov 2, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 15, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 5, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance