USPTO serial 75671878
TIDAL WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2001
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIDAL WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALIFORNIA DAY-FRESH FOODS, INC.
GLENDORA, CA
CALIFORNIA DAY-FRESH FOODS, INC.
GLENDORA, CA
Cincinnati, OH
Cincinnati, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Silverberg
Janet Silverberg PepsiCo Beverages & Foods555 West Monroe StreetMail Drop 11-10Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit juice and fruit drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA DAY-FRESH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA DAY-FRESH FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Chiquita Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chiquita Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named TIDAL WAVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |