USPTO serial 75671974
HIGH 5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH 5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | commercial, computer site, art, print, video and graphic, design for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |