USPTO serial 75672487
CP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winchester, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIANNE B. BOCHINSKI, ESQ.
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI ESQ AMERICAN TRADEMARK COMPANYP O BOX 2723WESTPORT, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | SPRAY COATINGS IN THE NATURE OF AEROSOL SPRAYS USED FOR REPAIRING POST-MOLDING SURFACE FLAWS OF PLASTIC PARTS, GREASES AND AEROSOL SPRAYS FOR LUBRICATION OF INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY; CORROSION INHIBITING SPRAY COATINGS FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USE ON IRON, STEEL, BRONZE, BRASS ALUMINUM, OTHER ALLOYS, ENGINES, BEARINGS MACHINE PARTS AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT; ANTI-RUST GREASES IN AEROSOL AND SPRAY FORMS; AND COLORANTS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PLASTIC MOLDING COMPOUNDS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
| 003 | ALL PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS AND POLISHES FOR MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
| 004 | MACHINE FLUIDS, NAMELY, GREASES AND LUBRICANTS FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINES, MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS AND FIREMAN; GRINDING FLUIDS FOR INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKING, AND, SOLUBLE CUTTING OILS AND FLUIDS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
| 021 | CUSTOM MADE AEROSOL DISPENSERS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |