Drawing for JADE COCOON STORY OF THE TAMAMAYU

USPTO serial 75672832

JADE COCOON STORY OF THE TAMAMAYU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JADE COCOON STORY OF THE TAMAMAYU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORS OF AMERICA915 BROADWAY FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC CIRCUITS; BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER TAPES; VIDEO GAME MACHINES AND VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPACT DISCS FEATURING GAMESACTIVE—
016GUIDE BOOK FEATURING INFORMATION ON PLAYING COMPUTER GAMES; PICTURE POSTCARDS, GREETING CARDS, POSTERS, PAPER BAGS, CALENDARS, COMIC BOOKS, COASTERS MADE OF PAPER, BOXES FOR PENS, POSTCARDS, NOTE BOOKS, PENCILS, BALLPOINT PENS, PENS, ERASERS, DRAFTING RULERS, DRAWING RULERS, UNGRADUATED RULERS, FOLDERS, SLATE BOARDS FOR WRITINGACTIVE—
028DOLLS, STUFFED DOLLS, ELECTRICAL GAMES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC EDUCATION GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN, ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT WITH A WATCH FUNCTION, ELECTRONIC DART GAMES, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, TOYS, NAMELY, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Sep 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 2, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance