USPTO serial 75672883
HUSKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUSKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Marames
WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Flashlights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |