Drawing for LUPOSIM

USPTO serial 75673054

LUPOSIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUPOSIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline M Ostroski

JACQUELINE M OSTROSKI BASF INC3000 CONTINENTAL DR NMOUNT OLIVE, NJ 07828-1234UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical products, namely polypropylene and polyethyene for use in the plastic manufacturing industry, unprocessed plastic molding compounds in the form of powders, granules, chips, dispersions, liquids or pastes for further use in the manufacture of plastics, unprocessed artificial and synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of plastics, chemical products as auxiliaries for use in the manufacture of plastics, catalyst for use in the manufacture of industrial chemicals and plasticsACTIVE—
017plastic materials in the form of boards, tubes, profiles, rods, blocks, sheeting or molded articles for use in the manufacture of plasticsACTIVE—
042services of a chemist, engineering services, namely services of a chemical engineer, services of a chemical laboratory, chemistry consultation, namely technical advice and provision of expert opinions in the field of chemical engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 17, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance