USPTO serial 75673131
CDM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CDM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROGER L BROWDY
ROGER L BROWDY BROWDY & NEIMARK PLLC624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Acoustical insulation for sandwich panels; acoustical insulation barrier panels; vibration and acoustical insulation for use in the construction industry; vibration and acoustical insulation for use in the manufacturing industry; vibration and acoustical insulation for use in the rail industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation of vibration and noise insulating materials | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consultation services in the field of vibration and noise insulating materials | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Composite Damping Material
- Other trademarks owned by Composite Damping Material
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CDM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |