USPTO serial 75673167
EDEPOSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2714809Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EDEPOSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA J. BUNTON
eDEPOSIT Corporation8757 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1330SILVER SPRING, MD 20910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ESCROW ACCOUNT AND CUSTOMER DEPOSIT SERVICES THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 22, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |