USPTO serial 75673817
EYECITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYECITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan E. Moskin
JONATHAN E MOSKIN PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS FOR EYES, NAMELY EYE CREAM, EYE GELS, EYE SHADOW, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, EYE MAKEUP, EYE PENCILS, EYEBROW PENCILS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | CONTACT LENS CLEANING SOLUTION, EYE LUBRICATING DROPS, VITAMINS, FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | OPTICAL WARES AND EYE CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER EYEGLASSES, COMPUTER SCREENS, COMPUTER GOGGLES, SPECTACLES, EYEGLASS LENS, EYEGLASS FRAMES, EYEGLASS CASES AND POUCHES, EYEGLASS BANDS, SUNGLASSES, BINOCULARS, MICROSCOPES, TELESCOPES, SAFETY GOGGLES, SPORTS GOGGLES, NIGHT VISION GOGGLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | VEGETABLE BASED FOOD BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EYEGLASSES, EYE CARE PRODUCTS, COSMETICS, OPTICAL WARE PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE BULLETIN BOARD IN THE FIELD OF CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF EYE CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING HEALTH INFORMATION AND CONSUMER INFORMATION IN THE AREA OF HEALTH RELATED GOODS AND SERVICES, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE INTERACTIVE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EYECITY.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ERGOVISION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EYECITY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |