USPTO serial 75674087
DREAMERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DREAMERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Nicholson, Esq.
JOSEPH F NICHOLSON ESQ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Reduced fat, low fat and fat free ice cream; ice cream confections; frozen dairy and non-dairy confections; frozen dairy and non-dairy desserts; frozen reduced fat, low fat and fat free dairy and non-dairy confections; ice milk; sorbets; sherbets; shaved ice; frozen fruit juice bars; frozen fruit juice flavored bars; frozen yogurt; fat free frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DREAMERY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |