USPTO serial 75674146
DURO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Lando
PETER C LANDO WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United States Filter Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by United States Filter Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DURO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |