USPTO serial 75674305
STARTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with STARTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO. KG
BOTTROP, DE
Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO. KG
CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
BOTTROP, DE
Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
BOTTROP, DE
Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
D-46240 Bottrop, DE
D-46240 Bottrop, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele S. Katz
Michele S. Katz Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motor vehicles, namely, automobile and parts and accessories therefor, namely, motor vehicles [ tires and ] rims; springs, shock absorbers and spring struts for motor vehicle chassis; gearshift levers [ and gearboxes ]for motor vehicles; steering wheels; exhaust systems, namely, fan-type manifolds, center parts and tail-end silencers and mufflers; seats and head restraints for vehicles; spoilers; lateral paneling; and tail aprons | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2001 |
| 037 | Customizing of motor vehicles, namely carrying out modifications to the engine body, wheels, and/or interior trim of mass-produced motor vehicles; painting of motor vehicles or parts thereof; and installation of interior trim for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2001 |
| 040 | [ Metal surface finishing, namely, plating of metallic parts on motor vehicles; plastic-coating ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
- Other trademarks owned by CRD CAR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH & CO., BETRIEBE KG
- Other trademarks owned by Brabus GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Brabus GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named STARTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 19, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 19, 2025 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 2, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 1, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |