USPTO serial 75674312
SUPER.MOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER.MOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B.Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD &CIVILETTI, LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC MAIL MIGRATION, ELECTRONIC MESSAGING, AND UNIFIED MESSAGING, NAMELY PROVIDING THE ABILITY TO COMBINE VOICE, ELECTRONIC MAIL, FAX, AND PAGING TECHNOLOGIES INTO ONE CENTRAL REPOSITORY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOWNLOADABLE FROM A WEBSITE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC MAIL MIGRATION, ELECTRONIC MESSAGING, AND UNIFIED MESSAGING, NAMELY PROVIDING THE ABILITY TO COMBINE VOICE, ELECTRONIC MAIL, FAX, AND PAGING TECHNOLOGIES INTO ONE CENTRAL REPOSITORY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEMOS IN THE AREA OF ELECTRONIC MAIL MIGRATION, ELECTRONIC MESSAGING, AND UNIFIED MESSAGING, NAMELY PROVIDING THE ABILITY TO COMBINE VOICE, ELECTRONIC MAIL, FAX, AND PAGING TECHNOLOGIES INTO ONE CENTRAL REPOSITORY | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO ELECTRONIC MAIL MIGRATION, ELECTRONIC MESSAGING, AND UNIFIED MESSAGING; PROVIDING CUSTOMER AND PRODUCT SUPPORT INFORMATION RELATING TO ELECTRONIC MAIL MIGRATION, ELECTRONIC MESSAGING, AND UNIFIED MESSAGING VIA A WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET AND IN PERSON; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF PRODUCT AND TECHNOLOGY SELECTION, MIGRATION TOOLS, TIMING, NETWORK AND SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION AND INSTALLATION; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT, ON-SITE ASSISTANCE, AND TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER NETWORK, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE INTERNET AND IN PERSON | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPER.MOVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |