Drawing for FULLY COOKED

USPTO serial 75674444

FULLY COOKED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2633427Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 8, 2002
Examiner
AN, GI HYUN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULLY COOKED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRT S. O'NEIL

KIRT S. O'NEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP300 CONVENT STREETSUITE 1600SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meatSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 21, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 15, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 10, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 14, 20088.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jan 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2003PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 27, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance