USPTO serial 75674583
RELEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RELEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL F. MARTIN
NEIL F MARTIN BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | soil conditioners for agricultural and domestic use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |