USPTO serial 75676191
COOL SCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOL SCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Bischoff
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying and electrical apparatus namely, telescopes, binoculars, microscopes, videoscopes, big screen microscopes, magnifying scopes, science experiment kits, lab kits and educational activity kits consisting primarily of microscopes, videoscopes, magnifying scopes, magnifying glasses, chemicals in vials, beakers, test tubes, test tube racks, cork stoppers, measuring spoons, funnels, stirring rods, tubing, litmus papers, filter papers, goggles, brushes, and open flame lamps | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |