USPTO serial 75676219
ZOLAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZOLAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
PAUL D SUPNIK BERKOWITZ BLACK & ZOLKE9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO RECORDINGS IN THE FIELD OF CHILDREN'S ENTERTAINMENT; INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER GAME PROGRAM | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, PANTS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, SUITS, COATS, JACKETS, VESTS, SWEATERS, BODY SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SWEATSUITS, SHORTS, TOPS, BOTTOMS, SLEEPWEAR, ROBES, GLOVES, BELTS, NECKTIES, HEADWEAR, SCARVES, SWEAT BANDS, SUN VISORS, SWIMWEAR, BEACH COVERUPS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, SANDALS,SHOES, FOOTWEAR, AND HATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, PLUSH DOLLS, TOY CARS, TOY SKATEBOARDS, TOY SURFBOARDS, TOY SNOWMOBILES, TOY WAVE RUNNERS, TOY WAKEBOARDS, TOY PARACHUTES, TOY DIRTBOARDS, TOY STREET LUGES, INFLATABLE TOYS, RADIO-CONTROLLED TOYS, HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC COMPUTER GAMES, BUILDING SETS AND KITES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Xtremezolar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Xtremezolar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ZOLAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |