Drawing for RIVERROCK RADIX

USPTO serial 75676473

RIVERROCK RADIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIVERROCK RADIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GENE C VALLOW

GENE C VALLOW LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS SUPPORT, NAMELY, CUSTOMER CARE BILLING, RATING, AND PROVISIONING FUNCTIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 22, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 22, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 7, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance