USPTO serial 75676655
SMARTCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack E. Haken
JACK E HAKEN AMERICA CORPORATIONPHILIPS ELECTRONICS N580 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | WORLD WIDE WEB SERVICES DIRECTED TOWARD ENHANCING THE USER'S APPRECIATION OF AN ASSOCIATED GOOD OR THE GOOD'S SOURCE, NAMELY SERVICES THAT, VIA OPERATION OF THE ASSOCIATED GOOD OR SOME OTHER INTERNET-SUPPORTING PRODUCT, ARE DELIVERED VIA THE INTERNET AND ARE TAILORED BY ONE OR MORE OF CONTEXT OF USE; THE ASSOCIATED GOOD'S CHARACTERISTICS, AND USER PREFERENCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |