USPTO serial 75676821
IOPERATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828142Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IOPERATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN S FRANK
KAREN S FRANK HOWARD RICE ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO MANAGE AND MANIPULATE DATA AND INFORMATION ON A COMPANY-WIDE BASIS, IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Solix Internet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Solix Internet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Emagia Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Emagia Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IOPERATIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |