USPTO serial 75677520
3CS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3CS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
WOOD DALE, IL
Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
Wood Dale, IL
Other trademarks owned by Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
Wood Dale, IL
Other trademarks owned by Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R. MARCUS
JOSEPH R MARCUS WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software use for processing, routing, administration, management, and reporting of voice, data and multimedia customer interactions in the telecommunications industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named 3CS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |