USPTO serial 75677835
PHOTOMECA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOTOMECA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
54340 Pompey, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A. Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated pre-press equipment for the printing and packaging industry, namely, machine tools, machines for printing on sheet metal, machines for photogravure, printing plates, offset printing machines, printing presses, printing cylinders, printing matrices, and photocomposing machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |