Drawing for PMG SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 75678104

PMG SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PMG SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAULA J KRASNY

PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE130 RANDOLPH DRONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA CAPTURE, ORGANIZATION, CALCULATION AND REPORTING, OFFERED TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY FOR PROFITABILITY REPORTING AND MANAGEMENTACTIVEMay 26, 1999
036CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE DATA CAPTURE, ORGANIZATION, CALCULATION AND REPORTING, OFFERED TO THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY FOR PROFITABILITY REPORTING AND MANAGEMENTACTIVEApr 21, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 17, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 17, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 18, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 26, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 22, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance