USPTO serial 75678114
CANARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brockville, Ontario, K6V 5V6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Anderson
BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND& MAIER & NEUSTADT1755 S JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | mounting kit consisting of bolts, screws and brackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | mechanized livestock waterers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric ventilation controls | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ceiling fans and structural parts therefor; electric lighting fixtures, namely, pendants, table lamps, floor lamps, cast aluminum outdoor illumination lanterns, outdoor lighting fixtures, wall lighting fixtures, chandeliers, track lighting units; ventilation equipment, namely fans for use in ventilation of commercial buildings and agricultural confinement buildings, inlets, and shutters; agricultural products, namely heat lamps and non-mechanized livestock waterers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |