USPTO serial 75678385
COMBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2691 GV' S-GRAVENZANDE, NL
2691 GV 's-Gravenzande, NL
2691 GV 's-Gravenzande, NL
2691 GV 's-Gravenzande, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE S. LONDA
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CONVEYOR PARTS, NAMELY, GUIDE RAILS, CURVED RAIL SECTIONS AND GUIDE TRACKS, FOR USE IN TRANSPORTING PACKAGED GOODS BY WAY OF PLASTIC AND STAINLESS STEEL SLATBAND CHAINS, AND EXCLUDING USE IN CONNECTION WITH RUBBER BELT CONVEYORS AND THE CONVEYOR PARTS, NAMELY, SCRAPERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REXNORD FLATTOP EUROPE B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MCC Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MCC Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MCC Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named COMBI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |