USPTO serial 75678425
COMMUNITY ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNITY ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
80539 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne J. Heeg
SUZANNE J HEEG SHEPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP333 S HOPE ST 48TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely operating systems, publishing utilities, workgroup file-sharing programs, all for local, wide-area, and global computer networks; digital recording equipment and computerized recording equipment for recording, transmission, and reproduction of texts, sounds and images over global computer networks, internal computer networks, and other private networks, namely digital video disc players, pre-recorded compact discs or tapes featuring music, voice or various sound effects, recording discs, audio mixers, audio recorders, sound amplifiers, interface cards for connecting audio mixers and audio recorders with other audio equipment, and component parts therefor, amplifiers, receivers, audio cassette-decks, TV-sets, video cassette recorders, camcorders, and CD ROM recorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |