USPTO serial 75678431
SPECTROCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPECTROCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall K. Broberg
STEVEN M WEISS C/O SEQUENOM INC3595 JOHN HOPKINS CTSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Pharmaceutical products for scientific and research use, namely, DNA sequences for use in genotyping, biopolymer profiling, detecting diseases, determining the progression of diseases, and determining drug responses | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical products for clinical and medical use, namely, DNA sequences for use in genotyping, biopolymer profiling, detecting diseases, determining the progression of diseases, and determining drug responses; diagnostic medical reagents for medical use in diagnosing inflammatory, infectious, central nervous system, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, antoimmune and genetic diseases, and cancer, comprised of reagents, processing chemicals, and solid matrix materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |