USPTO serial 75678858
COMMUNITY ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNITY ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
80539 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne J Heeg
SUZANNE J HEEG SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP333 S HOPE ST 48TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and marketing for others via an on-line electronic communications network and via other on-line media; providing marketing and business research and strategic planning in the fields of global commerce networks, internal computer networks, private networks and on-line businesses; auctioneering; dissemination and distribution of advertising materials, namely samples of advertising for on-line media; business consulting services in the fields of management and publicity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating, implementing and maintaining web sites for others over a global, internal and private computer networks; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; electronic desktop publishing for others; and computer software design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |