USPTO serial 75679631
ARCHIMICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531353Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARCHIMICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE
Manchester, GB
Manchester, GB
Leeds West Yorkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathy R. Moore
Cathy R. Moore ProPat, LLC425-C South Sharon Amity RoadCharlotte, NC 28211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals and chemical products for use in the manufacture of agrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and specialty chemicals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2006 |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations used to treat; common colds, asthma, liver disease, warts, blemishes, cancer, and aids; pharmaceutical preparations classified as; anti-flammatories, anti-cancer, cardiac depressants, anti-arrhythmics, anti-virals; dietary supplements, nutritional supplements; additives in milk for nutrition in baby food; diuretics; intravenous anesthetics, local anesthetics, tranquilizers, coronary vasodilators, anti-anginals, analgesics; veterinary preparations classified as; veterinary antibacterials; sanitizers for industrial or household use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHIMICA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHIMICA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by BTP CHEMICALS PLC
- Other trademarks owned by BTP CHEMICALS PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Clariant Chemicals Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ARCHIMICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |