USPTO serial 75679681
AMBIENT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMBIENT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS BAKER& MCKENZIE2 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVICES, NAMELY CHIP SETS FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES, SUCH AS MODEMS, PCMCIA CARDS AND USB DEVICES; NETWORKING DEVICES, NAMELY COMMUNICATION SERVERS, MODEMS, ROUTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |