USPTO serial 75679850
ERETURNZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERETURNZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN A SWERNOFSKY
STEVEN A SWERNOFSKY STEVEN A SWERNOFSKY LAW OFFICEP O BOX 390013MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94039-0013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Services for processing sales and returns orders, namely, for reversing orders for goods or services, for returning goods, for rerouting goods, and for reselling goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |