USPTO serial 75679934
MR. CHOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MR. CHOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W GRACE TRADEMARK DEPTLOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CHOPSTICKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, UNDERGARMENTS, SLEEP WEAR, SWIM WEAR, COVER UPS, RAIN WEAR, FOOTWEAR, HATS, HEAD WEAR, GLOVES AND SCARVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | FOOD, SAUCES, AND DAIRY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, NAMELY VEGETABLE OILS; TOFU; SOY-BASED BEVERAGES, USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE, MEAT, FISH, AND VEGETABLE BASED CHOW MEINS; EDIBLE OILS; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; SESAME OIL; PEANUT OIL, COCONUT OIL, PROCESSED AND EDIBLE SEAWEEDS, SOUPS; AND SOYBEAN OIL FOR COOKING | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food, sauces, and herbal and grain-based food beverages, namely, coffee; tea; chili sauce; sate sauce; soy sauce; rice; breads; cookies; candy; egg rolls; mustard; vinegar; dumplings; dim sum; pasta; flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes; bakery goods; baker products; dried chili peppers for use as a seasoning; chili powders; chili seasoning; chow mein noodles; salad dressing; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; grain based food beverages; brown rice beverages; brown rice-based beverages; hot sauces, lo meins; meat pies; mincemeat pies; rice based snack foods; won ton wrappers; and won tons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mr. Chow Enterprses, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mr. Chow Enterprses, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mr. Chow Enterprses, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mr. Chow Enterprses, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MR. CHOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |