USPTO serial 75680151
CYBER I.D.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBER I.D.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FEATURING GENERAL MERCHANDISE | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |