USPTO serial 75680667
JINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M ABEL ESQ FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VLY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 93635Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRONIC AIR CLEANERS; ELECTRONIC AIR CONDITIONERS; ELECTRONIC AIR DEODORIZERS; AQUARIUM FILTRATION, HEATING, AND LIGHTING APPARATUS; AUTOMATIC BREAD MAKING MACHINES FOR DOMESTIC USE; CHLORINATING UNITS; ELECTRIC CLOTHES DRYERS; ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS; DEHUMIDIFIERS; ELECTRIC YOGURT MAKERS; ELECTRIC FANS; FILTERING UNITS FOR DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL USE; FREEZERS; FURNACES; ELECTRONIC HEATERS; MICROWAVE OVENS FOR COOKING; ELECTRIC NIGHT LIGHTS; ELECTRIC OVENS; RANGES; REFRIGERATORS; LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPRISING PUMPS, VALVES AND FILTERS; ELECTRIC STOVES; SWIMMING POOL FILTERS, HEATERS, PUMPS, AND VACUUM CLEANERS SOLD OR USED IN COMBINATION THEREWITH; ELECTRIC TRACK LIGHTING UNITS; BATH AND HOT TUBS; ELECTRIC VAPORIZERS; ELECTRIC VENTILATING FANS; ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS; WATER BED HEATERS; WATER COOLERS; WATER FILTERING UNITS; HOT WATER TANKS; WHIRLPOOL BATHS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |