USPTO serial 75680771
LIGHTCOLUMN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIGHTCOLUMN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winter Springs, FL
Winter Springs, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Livingston
EDWARD M LIVINGSTON EDWARD M. LIVINGSTON, PA963 TRL TER DRNAPLES, FL 34103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COLUMNAR HOLDING FURNITURE IN THE NATURE OF A COLUMN FOR HOLDING VARIOUS ITEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |