USPTO serial 75681258
BEST EASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORA, ROGER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEST EASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF NONFICTION BOOKS, BOOKLETS, POSTERS, CALENDARS, AND RELATED PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY CATALOGS AND INFORMATIONAL BROCHURES, ALL FEATURING VARIOUS OUTDOOR RELATED TOPICS, INCLUDING HIKING, MOUNTAIN BIKING, ROCK CLIMBING, PADDLING, RIVER RUNNING, BIRDING AND WINDERNESS EXPLORATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |