USPTO serial 75681408
WHITE TULIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITE TULIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marnie Wright Barnhorst
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST SYMPHONY TOWERSTHE TRADEMARK GROUP750 B STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-8114Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guthy-Renker Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Guthy-Renker Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named WHITE TULIP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |