USPTO serial 75681442
UTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1M 7RD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arne M. Olson
ARNE M OLSON OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES AND FITTED CASES FOR EYEGLASSES AND SUNGLASSES; PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFORE | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | ARTICLES OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, TROUSERS; SHORTS AND PANTS; UNDERWEAR; SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SWEATSHIRTS AND T-SHIRTS; JUMPERS, CARDIGANS AND SWEATERS; JACKETS AND COATS; JEAN, SKIRTS AND DRESSES; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, CAPS AND VISORS; LEGWEAR, NAMELY, HOSIERY, LEGGINGS, SOCKS, STOCKING, AND TIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 13, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |