Drawing for CIRKIT

USPTO serial 75681819

CIRKIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRKIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

COLLEN IP

COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSINGWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING SET FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES COMPRISED OF PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS AND VIDEO TAPES, ELECTRONIC/ELECTRICITY MODULES, AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL FEATURING WORK PROJECTS AND TEACHER/STUDENT GUIDE WITH STUDENT ACTIVITIES SOLD AS A UNIT, TO TEACH SCHOOL CHILDREN AND STUDENTS IN THE FIELDS OF ELECTRICITY CONCEPTS AND SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO FORCE AND ENERGY PHENOMENA AND ELECTRICAL UNITS ESTIMATIONS AND CALCULATIONS WHICH IS DISTRIBUTED AND SOLD THROUGH AUTHORIZED DEALERS TO SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIESACTIVE—
028GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, EDUCATIONAL BOARD GAMES SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING BOARD GAMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance