USPTO serial 75682012
INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer H. Hammond
JENNIFER H HAMMOND SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL4520 MAIN STSTE 1100KANSAS CITY, MO 64111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS APPRAISALS AND RELATED BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES; NAMELY, BUSINESS BROKERING, MANAGEMENT AND TAX CONSULTING, AUDITING, BUSINESS PLANNING, MARKET STUDIES AND DUE DILIGENCE ANALYSIS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | REAL ESTATE APPRAISALS AND RELATED REAL ESTATE SERVICES; NAMELY, MORTGAGE BROKERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERING AND VALUATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |