Drawing for SUMACO

USPTO serial 75682112

SUMACO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUMACO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Kobulnick, Esq.

Jeffrey A. Kobulnick, Esq. Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLPSuite 50021650 Oxnard StreetWoodland Hills, CA 91367

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029PRESERVED FISH; CANNED FISHABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Nov 17, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 8, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 13, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance