USPTO serial 75682372
TERLOTHERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TERLOTHERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MIXING MACHINES FOR VISCOUS SUBSTANCES USED IN THE FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC AND HYDRAULIC MOTORS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE AS DRIVES FOR THE AFORESAID MACHINES, COUPLINGS FOR MACHINES; BELTS FOR MACHINES AND ENGINES OTHER THAN FOR LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES, FURNACES, STEAM GENERATORS, HUMIDIFIERS, INDUSTRIAL EVAPORATING MACHINES FOR EVAPORATING LIQUIDS OR VISCOUS SUBSTANCES USED IN THE PROCESSING INDUSTRY, STERILIZERS, PASTEURIZERS, REFRIGERATORS AND AIR CONDITIONER UNITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TERLET N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Machinefabriek Terlet
- Other trademarks owned by N.V. Machinefabriek Terlet
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named TERLOTHERM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |