Drawing for UNUMPROVIDENT

USPTO serial 75682759

UNUMPROVIDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNUMPROVIDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALAN RUDERMAN

ALAN RUDERMAN MILLER & MARTIN, LLPSTE 1000 VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY UNDERWRITING DISABILITY INSURANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 17, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 17, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 17, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 13, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance