Drawing for WAVESYNC

USPTO serial 75683367

WAVESYNC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2493186Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2001
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVESYNC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Brownlee

Michelle Brownlee Bose CorporationMountain RoadMS-40Framingham, MA 01701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009radio controllers, namely, controllers for remotely establishing predetermined settings in radios in rooms having occupants frequently changed, such as hotel rooms, sold through channels including those selling to renters of such rooms, such as hotels for the purpose of clearing settings in radios set by occupants who have vacated the roomsEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 18, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 10, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 10, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 26, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 5, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jan 5, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Jan 5, 2007ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 30, 2001CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 18, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 22, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance