USPTO serial 75683416
STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69190 Walldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL R GRAIF
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ 22ND FL2005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and ready-to-use preconfigured software-based templates for use in business planning and management, namely, computer software based templates and ready-to-use preconfigured software-based templates for retrieving, compiling and monitoring coded and encoded business information from internal databases and databases accessible via a global computer network in order to access business consolidation opportunities and enterprise resource planning requirements, analyze and simulate the effects of financial and risk management decisions on the business, transmit business information to shareholders; and accompanying material, namely, user manuals and operating instructions sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | written materials, namely, manuals, catalogs and operating instructions for computer software and ready-to-use preconfigured software-based templates all for use in business planning and management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software consultation services in the field of business planning and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAP Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STRATEGIC ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |